A reviewer showed us her afternoon. The model had summarized a long case into a page. The page was readable. It had also dropped the one fact that changed the outcome, and promoted a detail that felt important and was not. She spent twenty minutes reconstructing the case to be sure. The tool had saved her the reading and charged her the judgment plus the doubt.
If the expert's new job is fact-checking a confident page, you did not remove work. You changed its shape and hid the cost.
show the omission
A summary used for a decision should say what it left out, and it should link to the source of anything load-bearing. The reviewer needs a way to ask where did this come from without rereading the whole file on faith.
Do not style the summary as the answer. Style it as a brief. The decision stays with the person whose name is on it.
A short page that drops the one fact that matters is not a time savings. It is a risk with better typography.
measure the repair
Ask the reviewers, for a week, how often they had to undo or rebuild the draft. If the number is high, the summary is a tax. Either narrow what it is allowed to conclude, or stop putting it in the path of the decision.
Use summaries to help someone find the page. Do not use them as a substitute for the call.